| issue考试时候写的比较烂,词汇什么的都没用上,argu感觉考场上写的还好一些,只是给大家借鉴一下
36. The greatness of individuals can only be decided by those who live after them, not by there contemporaries.
The Text: Can the greatness of individuals be determined by people living after merely？ The author claims so, nevertheless in my point of view this statement goes too extreme. I concede that there are a number of people whose excellence and talents were not appreciated until after their death, even after several centuries. But as a matter of fact, most great works and achievements, in the realm raging from art to science, from politics to business, are fairly recognized by their contemporary people.开头有反问＋自己的鲜明立场
Admittedly, throughout the history have there been many genius neglected and unfairly treated, owing to their astonishing accomplishment and outlandish behavior not acknowledged by the society. The most striking example among all is perhaps Vincent Van Gogh, the well-known Holland painter, one of whose painting is worthy of millions of dollars today, yet lived a impoverished and misery life, having only one of his works sold and his talents scorned. Many great individuals are antipathetic to the society they live in and their works are too extraordinary to be popular, or they usually disobey routine rules. Both will lead to others' disagreement and prejudice. In such cases, the contemporaries' judgment of one's greatness is probably incorrect or biased, while people who live after him may have different ideologies and standards as time passes by, which make them capable of judging the greatness of their precursors objectively.句式相当好,语言很流畅,论述的很清晰,例子比较贴切的说。owing to没有错,due to更加常用于这种坏的、负面的原因的场合,不绝对,只是看time上用的比较多